Identity fraud is the biggest filed case type.
Cifas Fraudscape 2026 reports 242,003 identity-fraud filings in 2025, accounting for 54% of National Fraud Database filings.
DoorID's position is simple: identity checks, document checks and data checks are useful, but they do not show live access to the declared property.
The strongest support is not that address documents are always reported as a standalone fraud category. It is that identity and application fraud dominate, and false address evidence is a practical way those frauds get through.
Cifas Fraudscape 2026 reports 242,003 identity-fraud filings in 2025, accounting for 54% of National Fraud Database filings.
UK Finance describes third-party application fraud as criminals using stolen personal information and fake documents to open accounts.
Synthetic identity guidance identifies fake addresses, contact details and address links to unrelated identities as warning signs.
The fraudster can produce a convincing document, pass a narrow identity step, and still have no meaningful access to the property on the application.
| Fraud route | What can pass | What remains unproven | DoorID check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fake address document | Utility bill, statement, screenshot or edited file. | That the applicant can access the declared property. | Live address journey. |
| Stolen identity / third-party application | Identity data and documents gathered from breaches or social engineering. | That the person completing the application is linked to the property. | Short-life link and property-access result. |
| Synthetic identity | Mixed real and fabricated identity data that looks plausible. | That the fabricated address story survives a real-world check. | Pass, Refer or Fail with controlled evidence. |
These are the sources DoorID should cite around market risk and the address-verification gap.
Use DoorID where a document, liveness check or bureau match is not enough to justify approval, drawdown or payout.